4.7 Article

Additive manufacturing in armor and military applications: research, materials, processing technologies, perspectives, and challenges

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.030

关键词

Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Armor; Ballistic; Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review systematically examines the use of additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing (3DP) in military applications, including firearms, armor, and bioinspired ballistic resistant structures. The article analyzes the materials and structures created using AM technologies and explores the results of dynamic loading and impact tests. The study finds that there is an increase in military applications of 3D printing, particularly in gun prototypes. However, there are limitations and concerns regarding unclear regulations that may prevent these weapons from being accessible to ordinary citizens.
This review systematically examines the use of additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing (3DP), in the various aspects of military applications such as firearms, armor and ballistic resistant structures, including those bioinspired. The main goal is to provide a comprehensive exploration of AM in armor and military applications. The materials and structures created using AM technologies are analyzed and reported. Dynamic loading, and impact via Charpy and Izod tests were also explored in the search, although not considered in the armor results to be tests typically conducted at low strain rates, far from a real ballistic solicitation. Recently, an increase in military applications has been found, particularly gun prototypes fabricated in diverse materials with AM. Although the innovation, low costs, and manufacturing are clear advantages of these devices via 3D printing, there are limitations, such as the worrying panorama of unclear regulations that prevent these weapons from eventually reaching ordinary citizens. Current perspectives, opportunities, and challenges are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据