4.7 Article

Enhancing the integrity of a buried gas pipelines: Investigating ruptures, explosions, and strengthening solutions

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107738

关键词

Buried pipeline; Failure; Corrosion; Stress analysis; Numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a case study on a gas pipeline rupture, explosion, and subsequent fire, aiming to identify the cause and improve the pipeline's strength under specific conditions. The study conducted stress analysis and measured the pipe's actual wall thickness, highlighting the importance of accurately assessing the structural integrity of buried pipelines and the utility of finite element analysis.
The present paper presents findings from a case study of a buried gas pipeline that ruptured, causing a gas cloud explosion and subsequent fire. The study aimed to identify the incident's cause and improve the pipeline's strength under specific conditions. The study measured the pipe's actual wall thickness and conducted stress analysis using analytical and finite element methods to assess its integrity under corrosion. It evaluated if the 20-inch pipeline near road crossings could withstand external forces.In conclusion, the research underscores the importance of accurately assessing the structural integrity of buried pipelines, especially under conditions of corrosion. It highlights the utility of finite element analysis in providing a more precise understanding of stress distribution and can aid in designing pipelines that are better equipped to withstand various external pressures.The investigation illustrates the importance of increasing the strength of buried natural gas pipelines, in the crossing road area and, for this purpose, it was proposed (in terms of novelty associated with the study) a solution consisting in introduction of the pipeline in protective sleeves fitted with spacer rings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据