4.6 Article

Joint task semi-supervised semantic segmentation for TRUS image

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105654

关键词

Semi -supervised learning; Weakly supervised learning; Prostate segmentation; Transrectal ultrasound process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a semi-supervised neural network based on joint tasks is introduced for TRUS image segmentation. By combining confidence information from target localization and semantic segmentation, pseudo-labels are generated for collectively training unlabeled samples. Experimental results show that this approach outperforms other state-of-the-art models in segmentation performance with a smaller dataset, and reducing the coupling between tasks improves accuracy.
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is an important tool for prostate observation, playing a crucial role in medical processes such as multimodal image registration and surgical planning. However, TRUS images are often plagued by blurry boundary information and artifacts, making manual annotation a time-consuming and labor-intensive task, which results in insufficient pixel-labeled data for training neural networks. Therefore, this paper introduces a semi-supervised neural network based on joint tasks for TRUS image segmentation, which combines confidence information from target localization and semantic segmentation to generate pseudo-labels for collectively training unlabeled samples. Additionally, this method supports the generation of pseudo-labels using only location information for weakly supervised training of neural networks. Compared to other state-of-the-art models, our results show that this approach outperforms in segmentation performance with a smaller dataset, achieving an mean Dice similarity coefficient and mean Jaccard similarity coefficient of 92.8 % and 88.4 %, respectively. Furthermore, the experiments reveal that reducing the coupling of two decoders' parameters between the segmentation and detection tasks improves segmentation accuracy as dataset size decreases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据