4.7 Article

K2P2.1 is a regulator of inflammatory cell responses in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

期刊

JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103136

关键词

KCNK2; TREK1; Myovascular unit; Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; Barrier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

K2P2.1 plays a regulatory role in the autoimmune response of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), by regulating inflammatory cell response, adhesion, and transmigration in both endothelial and skeletal muscle cells. Inhibiting K2P2.1 enhances the inflammatory response, while activating K2P2.1 improves the disease course.
K2P2.1 (TREK1), a two-pore domain potassium channel, has emerged as regulator of leukocyte transmigration into the central nervous system. In the context of skeletal muscle, immune cell infiltration constitutes the pathogenic hallmark of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of K2P2.1 in the autoimmune response of IIMs. We detected K2P2.1 expression in primary skeletal muscle and endothelial cells of murine and human origin. We observed an increased pro-inflammatory cell response, adhesion and transmigration by pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of K2P2.1 in vitro and in in vivo myositis mouse models. Of note, our findings were not restricted to endothelial cells as skeletal muscle cells with impaired K2P2.1 function also demonstrated a strong pro-inflammatory response. Conversely, these features were abrogated by activation of K2P2.1 and improved the disease course of a myositis mouse model. In humans, K2P2.1 expression was diminished in IIM patients compared to non-diseased controls arguing for the translatability of our findings. In summary, K2P2.1 may regulate the inflammatory response of skeletal muscle. Further research is required to understand whether K2P2.1 could serve as novel therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据