4.7 Article

Study on the effects of carbon dioxide atmosphere on the production of biochar derived from slow pyrolysis of organic agro-urban waste

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 308-319

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.10.035

关键词

Biochar; Slow pyrolysis; Food waste; Agricultural waste; Carbon dioxide atmosphere; Agro-environmental properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated and compared the impact of using CO2 as a carrier gas during slow pyrolysis on the production and properties of biochar from food waste, rice husk, and grape tree branches waste. The results showed that CO2 atmosphere increased the biochar yield and influenced its physicochemical properties.
Slow pyrolysis, a widely recognized thermochemical technique, is employed to produce biochar usually under inert atmospheres. Recently, there is a growing interest in utilizing CO2 as a carrier gas during pyrolysis as an alternative to inert atmospheres, aiming to modify the resulting pyrolytic products and make them suitable for different applications. This study investigated and compared the impact of CO2 atmosphere with N2 on pyrolysis of food waste, rice husk, and grape tree branches waste via slow pyrolysis at temperatures of 400, 500, and 600 degrees C at 5 and 15 degrees C/min for 1 h, to evaluate biochar production and its properties. The results demonstrate that CO2 atmosphere increased the biochar yield for all feedstocks and significantly influenced the physicochemical properties of biochar. Compared to N2, CO2-derived biochar exhibited less volatile matter, higher carbon content, lower O/H and O/C molar ratios and enhanced textural properties. This study highlighted the potential of utilizing CO2 for biochar production and tailoring biochar properties for specific applications and the findings contribute to the establishment of sustainable and efficient waste management systems and the production of value-added biochar products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据