4.7 Article

Detection of mountain permafrost by combining conventional geophysical methods and thermal monitoring in the Retezat Mountains, Romania

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 111-123

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.08.001

关键词

Mountain permafrost; Electrical resistivity tomography; Ground penetrating radar; Thermal monitoring; Retezat Mountains

资金

  1. Sectorial Operational Programme for Human Resource Development [POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133391]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combined approach consisting in thermal monitoring and geophysical investigations by means of ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography was used to examine permafrost distribution within four rock glaciers in the Retezat Mountains. The small-scale variability of permafrost presence or absence above 2000 m in Southern Carpathians is determined by local surface cover characteristics. Therefore, the permafrost existence is limited to those sites where very large boulders occur, the income of solar radiation is reduced and the cooling effect of the coarse blocks is extremely efficient. Based on the thermal data, permafrost appears likely at those sites, where a strong cooling occurs in the early winter due to ground air flow (convection, advection). During the winter, below the thick snow cover an additional cooling mechanism is likely the result of low thermal conductivity of coarse blocks at sites where internal ventilation is inhibited. At these sites the mean annual ground surface temperature (MAGST) is negative, the temperatures at the bottom of the snow cover (BTS) at the end of the winter are lower than -3 degrees C and the ground freezing index (GFI) values are higher than 600 degrees C days. By contrast, BTS, MAGST and GFI values show a warmer pattern in the upper part of the ventilated zones, where inverse thermal behavior at the ground surface occur especially during cold seasons. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据