4.7 Article

Fast autoregressive tensor decomposition for online real-time traffic flow prediction

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111125

关键词

Fast autoregressive tensor decomposition; Online real-time traffic flow prediction; Tucker Decomposition; Core tensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a Fast Autoregressive Tensor Decomposition (FATD) algorithm for online real-time traffic flow prediction. The algorithm models and predicts historical traffic flow using Tucker decomposition and Tensor Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (Tensor SARIMA), and recovers the predicted traffic flow data using Inverse Tucker Decomposition, achieving reduced computational costs while maintaining high prediction accuracy.
Online real-time traffic flow prediction typically offers better real-time performance than offline prediction. However, existing studies rarely discussed online real-time traffic flow prediction and the balance between prediction accuracy and computational costs. Training and predicting traffic flow data with complex patterns by artificial intelligence models is usually time-consuming. Some high-accuracy statistical learning methods also reach a performance bottleneck in terms of computational speed. Therefore, a Fast Autoregressive Tensor Decomposition (FATD) algorithm is proposed for online real-time traffic flow prediction. First, the historical tensor data is decomposed by Tucker Decomposition into factor matrices and easy-to-compute core tensors, and these core tensors are modeled by Tensor Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (Tensor SARIMA). Second, a future core tensor is predicted by Tensor SARIMA. By the Inverse Tucker Decomposition, the traffic flow data to be predicted is recovered. The experimental results show that the FATD algorithm can reduce the computational cost while maintaining high accuracy. Compared with baselines, the FATD algorithm reduces MAE, RMSE, and the computational cost by approximately 35.04%, 26.86%, and 99.28% on average, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据