4.5 Article

Biomarker of Anopheles exposure in Ghanaian children with hemoglobin S and C

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.107043

关键词

Antibody response; Anopheles; Ghana; gSG6-P1; HbAC; HbAS; Malaria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterozygous carriers of HbAS and HbAC have a reduced risk of severe malaria, but not immunity against Plasmodium falciparum infection. Antibody levels against gSG6-P1 peptide in Anopheles mosquito saliva can serve as a serological biomarker for exposure to Plasmodium infection. This study highlights the importance of studying the role of hemoglobinopathies in malaria transmission for improving control interventions.
Heterozygous carriers of hemoglobin S and C (HbAS and HbAC) have a reduced risk of severe malaria but are not protected from Plasmodium falciparum infection, suggesting that the protection involves acquired immunity. During a blood meal, female Anopheles mosquitoes inject saliva that can elicit a host antibody response, which can serve as a proxy for exposure to Plasmodium infection. Previous studies have shown that the peptide gSG6-P1 of An. gambiae saliva is antigenic and highly Anopheles specific. Here, we used plasma samples from 201 Gha-naian children with wild-type hemoglobin (HbAA), HbAS, and HbAC to evaluate antibody levels against gSG6-P1 as a serological biomarker of Anopheles exposure and, therefore of P. falciparum infection risk. Malaria antigen (PfCSP, GLURP, Pfs230, and HB3VAR06)-specific IgG levels, demographic data, and data regarding P. falciparum infection and malaria control practices were also analyzed. Children with active P. falciparum infection had higher antibody levels against all antigens, and those with HbAS and HbAC had significantly higher antibody levels against Pfs230. Pfs230-specific IgG correlated negatively with gSG6-P1-specific IgG in children with HbAC. Our results highlight the importance of studying the role of hemoglobinopathies in malaria transmission to improve control interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据