4.5 Article

Management of swallowing disorders in ICU patients - A multinational expert opinion

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154447

关键词

Dysphagia; Critically ill patients; Tracheostomy; Post-extubation; ICU; Dysphagia treatment; Swallowing therapy; Pharyngeal electrical stimulation; Evidence -based clinical recommendations; Expert consensus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents expert opinions on the diagnosis and management of dysphagia in ICU patients. The panel suggests adopting clinical algorithms to promote standardized and high-quality care, and proposes two clinical management algorithms to improve early detection and effective treatment of dysphagia in ICU patients.
Background: Dysphagia is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, yet it remains underrecognized and often unmanaged despite being associated with life-threatening complications, prolonged ICU stays and hospitalization. Purpose: To propose an expert opinion for the diagnosis and management of dysphagia developed from evidencebased clinical recommendations and practitioner insights. Methods: A multinational group of dysphagia and critical care experts conducted a literature review using a modified ACCORD methodology. Based on a fusion of the available evidence and the panel's clinical experience, an expert opinion on best practice management was developed. Results: The panel recommends adopting clinical algorithms intended to promote standardized, high-quality care that triggers timely systematic dysphagia screening, assessment, and treatment of extubated and tracheostomized patients in the ICU. Conclusions: Given the lack of robust scientific evidence, two clinical management algorithms are proposed for use by multidisciplinary teams to improve early systematic detection and effective management of dysphagia in ICU patients. Additionally, emerging therapeutic options such as neurostimulation have the potential to improve the quality of ICU dysphagia care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据