4.7 Article

GLASS Daytime All-Wave Net Radiation Product: Algorithm Development and Preliminary Validation

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs8030222

关键词

satellite; remote sensing; net radiation; GLASS products

资金

  1. National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA122800]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41401381, 41101310, 41331173]
  3. Special Foundation for Young Scientists of State Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [15RC-12]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program [DE-FG02-04ER63917]
  5. CarboEuropeIP
  6. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  7. Ileaps
  8. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  9. National Science Foundation
  10. University of Tuscia
  11. Universite Laval
  12. Environment Canada
  13. U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mapping surface all-wave net radiation (R-n) is critically needed for various applications. Several existing R-n products from numerical models and satellite observations have coarse spatial resolutions and their accuracies may not meet the requirements of land applications. In this study, we develop the Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) daytime R-n product at a 5 km spatial resolution. Its algorithm for converting shortwave radiation to all-wave net radiation using the Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) model is determined after comparison with three other algorithms. The validation of the GLASS R-n product based on high-quality in situ measurements in the United States shows a coefficient of determination value of 0.879, an average root mean square error value of 31.61 Wm(-2), and an average bias of -17.59 Wm(-2). We also compare our product/algorithm with another satellite product (CERES-SYN) and two reanalysis products (MERRA and JRA55), and find that the accuracy of the much higher spatial resolution GLASS R-n product is satisfactory. The GLASS R-n product from 2000 to the present is operational and freely available to the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据