4.7 Article

Revision of the full stereochemistry of telomycin

期刊

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3qo01411h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have determined the stereochemistry of telomycin through analysis of its biosynthesis and made revisions to its structure.
Telomycin, a nonribosomal cyclic depsipeptide antibiotic discovered in the late 1950s, has recently been shown to display a unique lytic mode of action based on a specific interaction with the bacterial dimeric phospholipid cardiolipin. Noticeably, the bibliography dealing with the chemical structure and natural occurrence of telomycin and related congeners reveals important contradictions that put into question the currently accepted all l-amino acid stereochemistry for this antibiotic. Furthermore, the configuration at C beta of its beta-MeTrp residue remains undetermined and the olefin geometry of its Delta 2,3-Trp residue likewise demands clarification. A full revision of the relative and absolute stereochemistry of telomycin amino acids, also including the unambiguous determination of the sequence position of the diastereomeric residues present in this exciting antibiotic, was thus needed. Herein, we have ascertained the enantioselectivity of the canonical condensation domains involved in telomycin biosynthesis by phylogeny-based bioinformatic analysis of its nonribosomal peptide synthetases sequence and we have also carried out rigorous chiral amino acid analysis, by NMR and the advanced Marfey's method, to unequivocally determine the correct structure and absolute stereochemistry of the antibiotic, leading to a definitive stereochemical revision of the telomycin family. The full stereochemistry of telomycin, an exciting nonribosomal cyclic depsipeptide antibiotic, has been corrected by phylogeny-based bioinformatic analysis of its nonribosomal peptide synthetases sequence and rigorous chiral amino acid analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据