4.7 Article

In situ self-assembled NiS2 nanoparticles on MXene nanosheets as multifunctional separators: Regulating shuttling effect and boosting redox reaction kinetics of lithium polysulfides

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 645, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158859

关键词

NiS2/MXene; Multifunctional separator; Shuttling effect; Sluggish redox kinetics; Catalytic conversion; Li-S batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of NiS2/MXene nanocomposites as a modification for PP separators can effectively enhance the performance of Li-S batteries, improving the cycle capacity and stability.
The notorious shuttling effect and sluggish redox kinetics towards lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) seriously hinder the practical application of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. The development of a multifunctional separator, as cooperator of trapper-catalyst-conductor, is deemed to be an efficient and feasible solving strategy. Herein, the NiS2/MXene nanocomposites with mesoporous structures were synthesized by the hydrothermal reaction, in which 0D ultrafine NiS2 nanoparticles were in situ self-assembled on 2D conductive MXene nanosheets. The NiS2/MXene nanocomposites were then modified on PP separators to form a thin layer of 8 mu m in the Li-S batteries, which exhibit the significant characteristics of capture and conversion of LiPSs, as well as highlyefficient transferring pathways of electron/Li+ via the synergetic effect of NiS2 and MXene from their strong chemisorption abilities, rich catalyzing active sites, and high electron conductivity, accelerating to the redox reaction kinetics of LiPSs. Consequently, these Li-S batteries by using the modified PP separators show a high reversible capacity of 805.1 mAh/g at 0.2 C after 200 cycles. Even at 2 C, it still exhibits a low capacity decay of 0.038 % per cycle after long-term stable 1000 cycles. This work proves that the developing multifunctional separators are efficient strategies for high performance Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据