4.7 Article

Analysis of a reactive porous separation effects on depollution and indoor air quality: Application of LBM-MRT to heat and mass transfers

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108754

关键词

LBM-MRT; Reactive porous separation; Heat and mass transfer; Pollutant removal efficiency; Thermal efficiency; Indoor air quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of reactive porous separation on ventilation and depollution capacity. The results show that adding reaction improves indoor air quality and reduces air renewal time, without affecting thermal efficiency.
The reduction of energy demand and the indoor air quality associated with energy demand are the main goals of thermal buildings. This work is devoted to the study of the effect of a reactive porous separation on the ventilation (cooling) and depollution capacity in a rectangular room ventilated by air displacement. The model is considered as a cavity heated on its right verticle wall and thermally isolated by the other three walls. A porous separation divides the room into two compartments. The system of equations was solved using the Lattice Boltzmann method with multiple relaxation times. The extended Darcy Brinkman-Forchheimer model was used to simulate the porous material. An additional linear term is added to the standard transport equations (material diffusion) to account for reaction effects, this term was derived from Arrhenius' law. Over a wide range of Richardson and Darcy numbers, the results of the computations show the influence of these parameters on the flow structure, making it possible to categorize the different convection phenomena (natural, forced and mixed). The most important point to note is that the addition of reaction (fixing reaction) improves indoor air quality and can achieve a 55 % reduction in air renewal time, thus saving on energy costs. However, this reactif effect has no influence on the thermal efficiency of the proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据