☆ 4.6 Article

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in obese patients

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Review Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pengyu Li et al.

Summary: Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) appears to have advantages over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in terms of spleen preservation, surgical technique, and conversion rate, but it is more costly. There is no significant difference between RDP and LDP in terms of postoperative complications, except for 30-day mortality.

UPDATES IN SURGERY (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Procedure-specific Training for Robot-assisted Distal Pancreatectomy

Sjors Klompmaker et al.

Summary: This study successfully implemented robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) by providing specific training to practicing surgeons, leading to improvements in perioperative blood loss, operating time, and length of stay without compromising safety. The results confirmed the efficacy and safety of RADP compared to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) through propensity-score matching analysis.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Matteo De Pastena et al.

Summary: This study analyzed the Quality of Life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), finding that robotic surgery was associated with improvement in specific domains of QoL but higher costs relative to laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery may be more cost-effective when a willingness to pay of more than 4800 Euros/QALY was accepted, indicating potential benefits in certain circumstances.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Surgery

Risk factors and outcomes of conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review

A. Balduzzi et al.

Summary: The study conducted a systematic review on conversion to open surgery in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy, revealing a conversion rate of 17.1%. The main indications for conversion were vascular involvement, concern for oncological radicality, and bleeding. Risk factors for conversion included malignancy as an indication for surgery, tumor proximity to vascular structures, higher BMI, and multi-organ resection.

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Surgery

Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review

Kai Siang Chan et al.

Summary: This study provides a detailed summary of the current evidence on the learning curve in minimally invasive pancreatic resection, showing no significant difference between the learning curve for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, and robotic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. These findings are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of the studies published to date.

SURGERY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis

S. Lof et al.

Summary: A multicentre international propensity score-matched study found that there was no significant difference in major morbidity rates between robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, RDP showed better conversion rates, spleen preservation rates, and readmission rates compared to LDP.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial

B. Bjornsson et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications

Maria C. Cusimano et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Pancreatectomy and body mass index: an international evaluation of cumulative postoperative complications using the comprehensive complications index

Brendan P. Lovasik et al.

HPB (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy. A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Paschalis Gavriilidis et al.

HPB (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sivesh K. Kamarajah et al.

HPB (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Thijs de Rooij et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA)

Jony van Hilst et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study

Sofoklis Panteleimonitis et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After

Claudio Bassi et al.

SURGERY (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Oncology

Conversion of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Predictors and Outcomes

Ibrahim Nassour et al.

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Impact of Obesity on Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy

Shin-E Wang et al.

JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

Peter C. Austin et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique

Mustapha Daouadi et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

The Comprehensive Complication Index A Novel Continuous Scale to Measure Surgical Morbidity

Ksenija Slankamenac et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Body Mass Index and Outcomes from Pancreatic Resection: a Review and Meta-analysis

Andrew M. Ramsey et al.

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY (2011)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Obesity 2 Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK

Y. Claire Wang et al.

LANCET (2011)

添加到收藏夹

Review Statistics & Probability

Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

Elizabeth A. Stuart

STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples

Peter C. Austin

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients

Olumuyiwa A. Bamgbade et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2007)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey

D Dindo et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2004)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Robotics in general surgery - Personal experience in a large community hospital

PC Giulianotti et al.

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2003)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.