4.6 Article

Investigation on regeneration of zeolite 13X-water adsorbent bed under vacuum condition: A computational approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102243

关键词

Adsorption; Heat transfer; Mass transfer; Regeneration temperature; Thermal conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study numerically investigates the impact of adsorbent regeneration on the performance of adsorption cooling systems under vacuum conditions. The results show that particle diameter significantly affects the mass transfer coefficient and desorption rate during the desorption process.
The present work investigates the adsorbent regeneration numerically in a vacuum to enhance adsorptioncooling systems' performance. A two-dimensional study on the desorption of water vapor from a zeolite 13X bed in a vacuum is studied using COMSOL Multiphysics. Coupled mass, heat, and momentum equations are solved for the adsorbent bed with different particle sizes to estimate temperature and moisture variation. The simulation is validated with experimental results from the literature. The study shows that the particle diameter significantly affects the mass transfer coefficient related to the desorption process. An increase in particle diameter from 3 to 4 mm decreased the mass transfer coefficient by 43.8 %, and 3 to 5 mm was reduced by 64.0 %. Similarly, in the case of desorption, particles with size 3 mm had the maximum desorption rate (0.27-0.14 kgw/kgadsorbent). An increase in particle diameter from 3 to 4 mm and 3 to 5 mm reduced the desorption process by 8.4 % and 13.8 %, respectively. The temperature change in a straight line along the radial direction of the adsorbent bed is computed, and the result showed that heat input affects the heat transfer rate but not its direction. As the desorption of an adsorbent bed depends on various parameters, an optimization study should be carried out to optimize particle size, height and width of the bed, thermal conductivity, working pressure, moisture content, and regeneration temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据