4.3 Article

Effects of Biofertilizers and Potassium Sulfate On Nutrients Uptake and Physiological Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Drought Stress

期刊

GESUNDE PFLANZEN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10343-023-00954-w

关键词

Biofertilizer; Sulfate of potash; Drought stress; Microelements; Macroelements

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of biofertilizer containing potassium-solubilizing bacteria, phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria on maize growth and drought tolerance. The findings suggest that biofertilizers have the potential to improve maize yield and physiological characteristics, particularly under drought stress.
Drought stress is one of the primary stresses that reduce crops' yield in some parts of the world. In this regard, to mitigate drought stress effects on plants, farmers usually apply chemical fertilizers that lead to environmental issues. This study aimed to investigate the effect of biofertilizer application containing potassium-solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas koreensis and Pseudomonas vancouverensis), phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas putida), and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Pantoea agglomerans) as an environmentally friendly biofertilizer for the growth and uptake of some essential nutrients in maize and its effect on drought tolerance. To achieve this, a Completely Randomized Design with ten treatments experiment was conducted in greenhouse conditions. The findings revealed that biofertilizers have the potential to improve maize yield and physiological characteristics, particularly under drought stress. The discussion section explores the mechanisms through which biofertilizers exert their effect and discusses practical implications for agricultural practices and environmental sustainability. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into sustainable agricultural practices and has the potential to inform decision-making processes for farmers and policymakers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据