4.3 Article

The Gender Happiness Gap in China: Composition Effect or Coefficient Effect?

期刊

FEMINIST ECONOMICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2023.2279212

关键词

Happiness; gender gap; decomposition; China; J16

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that women in China are happier than men mainly due to their higher positive responsiveness to happiness determinants. Women obtain happiness from education and spousal income, rather than personal income. The study also shows that the greater the income gap between husband and wife, the greater the gender happiness gap.
This study revisits the puzzle of the gender happiness gap in China based on data from the China General Social Survey between 2008 and 2017. Decomposition analyses in this study indicate that women are happier than men mainly due to women's higher positive responsiveness to happiness determinants (the coefficient effect) rather than a higher level of objective achievements (the composition effect). Women obtain happiness from education despite not having a higher education, and women get more happiness from spousal income instead of personal income. Within families, the study finds that the greater the income gap between husband and wife, the greater the gender happiness gap. To help explain this gap, the study demonstrates that women living under traditional gender norms have higher evaluation of their education when they obtain lower levels of education than those living under egalitarian norms.HIGHLIGHTSIn China, women's objective achievements in education and income have improved but remain lower than men's.Women are happier than men due to higher responsiveness to achievements.The income gap between husbands and wives increases women's subjective well-being and reduces men's.The traditional belief that men are more capable leaves women worse off in education.The gender happiness gap is much larger in urban areas and eastern regions of China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据