4.3 Article

Zoledronic Acid Treatment After Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial

期刊

PM&R
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 833-843

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.01.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the effect of intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg on the extent and course of bone loss after spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel-group trial. Setting: Acute in-patient, tertiary-care rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Convenience sample of 17 in-patients with SCI < 12 weeks before randomization; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale A, B, or C and medically stable. Twelve patients were evaluated at the primary endpoint at 6 months. Methods: Patients meeting study criteria were randomly assigned to zoledronic acid 5 mg or matching placebo. Dual x-ray absorptiometry scan and serum for bone markers (type 1 procollagen amino-terminal propeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide) were obtained at baseline and after 3 months, 6 months, and the every 6 months for up to 2 years. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip after 6 months; secondary endpoints were changes in BMD at other skeletal sites and changes in levels of serum bone markers. Results: The group treated with zoledronic acid had a smaller decrease in BMD at 6 months at the total hip than the placebo group (right: -2.2 +/- 3.4% versus -8.6 +/- 3.5%, respectively, P = .03; left: -3.7 +/- 1.0% versus -12.3 +/- 6.9%, P = .03). Differences in BMD at the femoral neck were similar (right: -5.1 +/- 6.5% versus -20.0 +/- 6.4%, P = .01; left: -1.1 +/- 3.5% versus -11.1 +/- 7.4%, P = .02) with larger bone loss and smaller between group differences at the knee. Zoledronic acid resulted in a decrease in serum levels of both formation and resorption markers. Conclusions: Zoledronic acid is effective at mitigating bone loss after SCI. Duration of efficacy and activity at different skeletal sites may differ from that observed in able-bodied individuals and needs further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据