4.7 Article

Crystallization of Metastable Isonicotinamide Polymorphs and Prevention of Concomitant Crystallization by Additives

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 8584-8596

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00687

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concomitant crystallization of polymorphs is a significant issue for the pharmaceutical industry. The study investigated the use of crystallization additives to control crystallization and prevent the formation of multiple polymorphs simultaneously. The results demonstrated that certain additives can facilitate the formation of metastable forms and control the crystallization outcome of isonicotinamide (INA).
Concomitant crystallization of polymorphs is a major problem for the pharmaceutical industry, and in general, a better understanding of this phenomenon is necessary to ensure the crystallization of just one desired polymorph. Isonicotinamide (INA) forms six polymorphs which often crystallize concomitantly. Here, we studied whether the use of crystallization additives can facilitate the formation of INA metastable forms and prevent concomitant crystallization. Crystallization of INA was explored under different conditions by performing cooling and evaporative crystallization from different pure solvents and in the presence of crystallization additives. Some additives, such as naphthalene-1,5-diol, 4-carboxybenzeneboronic acid, and 2-picolinic acid, provided achieving crystallization control. Theoretical calculations allowed us to gain partial insight into the factors responsible for the polymorphic outcome of INA crystallization. The crystal structures of INA polymorphs II, IV, and VI, which often crystallize concomitantly, are almost identical. Therefore, it is possible that the energy barriers of nucleation and crystal growth rates for these polymorphs are highly similar, whereas, in the presence of additives, the crystallization of structurally more different Forms III or I could be achieved by altering these energy barriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据