4.7 Article

Self-cleaning paper-based microfluidic biosensor employing DNAzyme and semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube for copper ion detection

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108602

关键词

Copper pollution; Chemiresistive; Superhydrophobic paper; Paper-based electrode; Electrochemical biosensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-cleaning paper-based microfluidic biosensor was developed using hydrophobic paper decorated with polymeric octadecyl trichlorosilane. The biosensor showed improved performance and could effectively measure the concentration of copper ions in livestock feed and manure.
Microfluidic paper-based analytical device (mu PAD) offers a simple and efficient platform for point-of-care monitoring, which can be beneficial for copper determination in livestock feed and manure. However, common cellulose paper has excellent hydrophilicity, causing mu PAD is accompanied by poor mechanical properties, short service life, and low sensitivity. Here, a self-cleaning paper-based microfluidic biosensor for Cu2+ determination was proposed to overcome the mentioned shortages in the application. Polymeric octadecyl trichlorosilane was synthesized and decorated on cellulose paper to form hydrophobic paper, which can improve the hydrophobicity, self-cleaning, and pollution ability. In addition, hydrophobic paper, semiconducting singlewalled carbon nanotube, and DNAzyme through the chemical bond were employed to fabricate a self-cleaning paper-based microfluidic biosensor. The properties were investigated using scanning electron microscopy, Raman, and electrochemical methods. The detecting parameters were also optimized. It could measure the Cu2+ concentration from 1 nM to 100 mu M, and the detection limit was 0.65 nM. The self-cleaning paper-based microfluidic biosensor was applied to detect Cu2+ concentration in livestock feed and manure that can meet the requirements for fast screening and detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据