4.8 Article

Nature of Zirconia on a Copper Inverse Catalyst Under CO2 Hydrogenation Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 48, 页码 26350-26362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c09947

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the nature of zirconia on a copper inverse catalyst under CO2 hydrogenation to methanol conditions was comprehensively investigated using density functional theory calculations and the Grand Canonical Basin Hopping method. The research revealed significant changes in the active site induced by various reaction parameters, and suggested that the active site can be considered as a statistical ensemble of diverse structures.
The growing concern over the escalating levels of anthropogenic CO2 emissions necessitates effective strategies for its conversion to valuable chemicals and fuels. In this research, we embark on a comprehensive investigation of the nature of zirconia on a copper inverse catalyst under the conditions of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. We employ density functional theory calculations in combination with the Grand Canonical Basin Hopping method, enabling an exploration of the free energy surface including a variable amount of adsorbates within the relevant reaction conditions. Our focus centers on a model three-atom Zr cluster on a Cu(111) surface decorated with various OH, O, and formate ligands, noted Zr3Ox (OH) y (HCOO)(z)/Cu-(111), revealing major changes in the active site induced by various reaction parameters such as the gas pressure, temperature, conversion levels, and CO2/H-2 feed ratios. Through our analysis, we have unveiled insights into the dynamic behavior of the catalyst. Specifically, under reaction conditions, we observe a large number of composition and structures with similar free energy for the catalyst, with respect to changing the type, number, and binding sites of adsorbates, suggesting that the active site should be regarded as a statistical ensemble of diverse structures that interconvert.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据