3.9 Article

Earnings management in local governments under a soft control regime

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2021-0144

关键词

Earnings management; Local government; Soft regulatory control measure; Random effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the impact of hard regulatory control on the level of earnings management in local governments. The findings suggest that a soft regulatory regime does not diminish discipline in municipalities, indicating that other authorities should consider adopting a soft regulatory approach.
PurposeThis study explores whether hard regulatory control decreases the level of earnings management in local governments. The implementation of a new regulatory approach by Norwegian authorities provides the opportunity for an empirical study.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt a two-stage strategy to investigate the existence of earnings management, using the Jones (1991) and modified Jones (Dechow et al., 1995) models to construct a random-effects model.FindingsThe authors test the hypothesis that, given decentralisation of control, there will be an increase in opportunistic financial reporting. This study's findings suggest that this is not the case, thereby indicating that a soft control regime does not diminish discipline in municipalities.Practical implicationsThis study has practical implications for policymaking in the public sector. Its findings suggest that municipalities do not engage in more earnings management under a soft regulatory regime. Hence, other authorities should consider adopting a soft regulatory approach to controlling local governments and their financial reporting systems.Originality/valueThis study contributes to a growing body of literature regarding earnings management by local governments. The authors investigate a hypothesis previously untested in the literature by comparing the degree of earnings management under different regulatory control regimes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据