4.7 Article

Genome-wide siRNA Screening at Biosafety Level 4 Reveals a Crucial Role for Fibrillarin in Henipavirus Infection

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005478

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1042452]
  3. Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics - Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF)
  4. Victorian Department of Industry, Innovation and Regional Development (DIIRD)
  5. Australian Phenomics Network (APN)
  6. Australian Government's Education Investment Fund through the Super Science Initiative
  7. Australasian Genomics Technologies Association (AMATA)
  8. Brockhoff Foundation
  9. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hendra and Nipah viruses (genus Henipavirus, family Paramyxoviridae) are highly pathogenic bat-borne viruses. The need for high biocontainment when studying henipaviruses has hindered the development of therapeutics and knowledge of the viral infection cycle. We have performed a genome-wide siRNA screen at biosafety level 4 that identified 585 human proteins required for henipavirus infection. The host protein with the largest impact was fibrillarin, a nucleolar methyltransferase that was also required by measles, mumps and respiratory syncytial viruses for infection. While not required for cell entry, henipavirus RNA and protein syntheses were greatly impaired in cells lacking fibrillarin, indicating a crucial role in the RNA replication phase of infection. During infection, the Hendra virus matrix protein co-localized with fibrillarin in cell nucleoli, and co-associated as a complex in pull-down studies, while its nuclear import was unaffected in fibrillarin-depleted cells. Mutagenesis studies showed that the methyltransferase activity of fibrillarin was required for henipavirus infection, suggesting that this enzyme could be targeted therapeutically to combat henipavirus infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据