4.4 Article

Degradation of Diethyl Phthalate by HO• and SO4•- in the Aqueous Phase: Mechanisms, Kinetics, and Toxicity

期刊

ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 460-470

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00317

关键词

degradation mechanism; diethyl phthalate; hydroxyl radical; sulfate radical; kinetics; ecotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical degradation processes of diethyl phthalate (DEP) induced by HO· and SO4·- in water were theoretically studied. The results showed that H abstraction reactions were the most favorable pathways for the degradation reactions of DEP. HO· exhibited higher reactivity towards DEP compared to SO4·-.
The chemical degradation processes of diethyl phthalate (DEP) induced by HO center dot and SO4 center dot- in aqueous solution were studied in a theoretical way. Not only radical addition and H-abstraction reactions but also single-electron transfer processes of DEP were considered. The thermodynamic and kinetic results indicate that the more favorable pathways are the H abstraction occurring in aliphatic side chains for all HO center dot/SO4 center dot--initiated degradation reactions of DEP. Subsequent reaction mechanisms of crucial primary intermediates were taken into account. At 298 K, the total rate constants for DEP degradation reactions induced by HO center dot and SO4 center dot- are 2.34 x 10(9) and 1.24 x 10(8) M-1 s(-1), respectively. They are in accordance with the experimental data. In comparison to SO4 center dot-, HO center dot has higher reactivity toward DEP in the research temperature range of 273-303 K. Considering the impact on the water eco-environment and human health, DEP and its 10 products have no bioaccumulation potential, but most products are developmentally toxic, except for (Z)-ethyl-2,5-dioxopent-3-enoate. Moreover, (Z)-ethyl-2,5-dioxopent-3-enoate is acutely toxic to fish; phthalic acid is mutagenicity positive; and we should pay more attention to them in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据