4.4 Article

Ferric Iron Substitution Mechanism in Bridgmanite under SiO2-Saturated Conditions at 27 GPa

期刊

ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 471-478

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00326

关键词

experimental; bridgmanite; phase relations; lower mantle; high-pressure chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The substitution mechanisms of Fe3+ in bridgmanite and its impact on physical properties were investigated under specific high pressure and temperature conditions. The study found that the fraction of Fe3+ increases with temperature, and the substitution mechanism only takes place under specific conditions. Additionally, the absence of vacancies in bridgmanite under specific conditions has important implications for lower-mantle dynamics.
The chemistry of bridgmanite is a crucial parameter for understanding the structure and dynamics of the Earth's lower mantle. Incorporating Al, Fe2+, and Fe3+ into MgSiO3 bridgmanite can significantly affect its physical properties. We investigated the substitution mechanisms of Fe3+ in bridgmanite under SiO2- and Fe2O3-saturated conditions at 27 GPa and 1700-2000 K using a multianvil apparatus. The fraction of Fe3+ in bridgmanite increases from 0.085 to 0.202 atoms pfu with increasing temperature. We observed that only the charge-coupled mechanism takes place in bridgmanite under the studied conditions by forming the FeFeO3 component, which increases from 4.0 +/- 0.6 mol % at 1700 K to 9.9 +/- 0.7 mol % at 2000 K. The absence of vacancies in bridgmanite under SiO2-saturated conditions implies that bridgmanite in mid-ocean ridge basalt layers of subducted slabs in the lower mantle should have higher viscosity and lower electrical conductivity than that in the surrounding mantle. These differences in bridgmanite properties should affect lower-mantle dynamics, for example, enhance slab penetration more deeply into the lower mantle due to viscosity difference between mid-ocean ridge basalt and surrounding bridgmanite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据