4.5 Article

Assessing seasonal fluctuations in leachate chemical properties and leachate pollution index as contamination indicators

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-12008-9

关键词

Municipal solid waste; Landfill leachate; Physicochemical characterization; Leachate pollution index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the characteristics of urban leachate and found that improper waste management practices led to the generation of large quantities of contaminated liquid. Analysis of the leachate revealed seasonal variations and highlighted the potential contamination of the landfill leachate.
Municipal solid waste (MSW) management practices that lack scientific rigor and use impromptu methods have produced massive leachate in urban complexes. Nowadays, the management of leachate has become an utmost concern worldwide. The MSW landfill site was a low-lying, open dump that operated in a non-engineered way. In this context, the physicochemical characterization of leachate has been carried out. Leachate sampling was done at the Bhandewadi dumpsite, Nagpur, for three seasons (summer, rainy, and winter). During analysis, parameters such as COD, BOD5, pH, TKN, TSS, sulfates, and chlorides were analyzed, and the obtained data was compared with the standard EPA 2003 and CPHEEO 2016 methods. Values of COD, BOD5, TKN, sulfates, and chlorides were in the range of 2500-16,000 mg/L, 495-2500 mg/L, 167-1900 mg/L, 240-900 mg/L, and 1400-5900 mg/L with respect to all three seasons, respectively. In conjunction with physicochemical analysis, the landfill leachate's leachate pollutant index (LPI) was assessed. The highest LPI values were observed for summer (14.323) as compared to rainy (12.301) and winter (11.348) data. This index reflects the hazardous character of MSW leachate and the total potential for leachate contamination. The results of this study showed seasonal variations in the observed data. Age and seasonal fluctuations therefore substantially influence the composition of the leachate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据