4.2 Article

Spiritual Care Perspectives of Elderly Individuals with Parkinson's Disease and Formal Caregivers: A Qualitative Study in Turkish Nursing Homes

期刊

JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01963-9

关键词

Caregivers; Elderly; Nursing home; Parkinson's disease; Spiritual care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the perceptions and experiences of elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease and formal caregivers regarding spiritual care. The findings show that living in a nursing home can affect the spiritual dimensions of elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease and increase their spiritual needs. However, formal caregivers do not offer specific spiritual care practices for individuals with Parkinson's disease.
This study aimed to determine the perceptions and experiences of elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease and formal caregivers regarding spiritual care. A qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological design. Fifteen formal caregivers and eight elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease from two nursing homes in Turkiye participated in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face individual interviews, and thematic analysis was employed to examine the data. Two themes were obtained from the data analysis: (I) spiritual care in nursing homes and (II) living with Parkinson's disease in nursing homes. Findings showed that living in a nursing home with Parkinson's disease affects the spiritual dimensions of elderly individuals and increases their spiritual needs. Additionally, it was found that although formal caregivers implemented a diverse range of practices to address the spiritual care needs of individuals residing in a nursing home, they did not offer any specific spiritual care practices for individuals with Parkinson's disease. Based on our findings, it is considered necessary to have spiritual counselors and formal caregivers with expertise in Parkinson's disease in nursing homes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据