4.7 Article

Temporal Dynamics of CD8+ T Cell Effector Responses during Primary HIV Infection

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005805

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI076066, P30 AI045008]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology [AI067854]
  3. Fonds de la Recherche Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S): Reseau SIDA/Maladies infectieuses
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 103230, CTN 257]
  5. Canadian HIV Cure Enterprise Team Grant from the CIHR [HIG-133050]
  6. CANFAR
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/K012037/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/K012037/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of HIV-specific CD8(+) T cell cytolytic function is a primary factor underlying progressive HIV infection, but whether HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells initially possess cytolytic effector capacity, and when and why this may be lost during infection, is unclear. Here, we assessed CD8(+) T cell functional evolution from primary to chronic HIV infection. We observed a profound expansion of perforin(+) CD8(+) T cells immediately following HIV infection that quickly waned after acute viremia resolution. Selective expression of the effector-associated transcription factors T-bet and eomesodermin in cytokine-producing HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells differentiated HIV-specific from bulk memory CD8(+) T cell effector expansion. As infection progressed expression of perforin was maintained in HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells with high levels of T-bet, but not necessarily in the population of T-betLo HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells that expand as infection progresses. Together, these data demonstrate that while HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells in acute HIV infection initially possess cytolytic potential, progressive transcriptional dysregulation leads to the reduced CD8(+) T cell perforin expression characteristic of chronic HIV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据