4.8 Article

Dual Parallel-PMSM System Using Single PMSM Control Hardware: A PLL-Integrated UIO Approach

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 15300-15313

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3309901

关键词

Current estimation; interval observer; multipermanent magnet synchronous machine; sensorless; unknown input observer (UIO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a method to build a dual parallel PMSM based on traditional PMSM control hardware without additional sensors, and verifies the performance of the system and the robustness of the controller through experiments.
A permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) control hardware has integrated two phase-current sensors and a rotor position sensor to realize the control of the motor. Connecting an additional PMSM in parallel without modifying the control hardware would further reduce the cost of building up a multimotor system. However, in this new configuration, not all the necessary information is available directly from the existing sensors, resulting in potential risks in controlling the system properly. In this article, a new unknown input observer (UIO) is developed via interval observer joint phase-lock-loop. The proposed UIO can asymptotically not only estimate the phase current of each motor but also reconstruct the rotor position of the additional motor. Then, a delicately designed controller together with the proposed UIO realizes the speed control of the system. Comprehensive experiments including start-up, speed, and load torque variation verify that the proposed system can achieve the desired goal either in the steady or transient operation state. Moreover, the controller's robustness to variations in stator resistance, inductance, and flux are verified both by simulation and experiment. In this way, without equipping any additional sensors, building a dual parallel PMSM based on conventional single PMSM control hardware is entirely feasible in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据