4.7 Article

Evolution of Silurian phytogeography, with the first report of Aberlemnia (Rhyniopsida) from the Pridoli of West Junggar, Xinjiang, China

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2023.111903

关键词

Paleobotany; Biogeography; Embryophyte; Sporophyte; Spores

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytogeography plays a vital role in the evolution of plants. This paper describes a new species of a spore-bearing plant from the upper Silurian period in West Junggar, China. By analyzing global Silurian macrofossil records, the study reveals the spatial-temporal distribution of Silurian plant macrofossils and identifies two phytogeographic realms during the Pridoli Epoch.
The development of phytogeography is an essential aspect of floral evolution. The Silurian is considered a pivotal period for the development of early land vegetation based on both macrofossil and microfossil evidence; however, the evolution of phytogeographic zonation at that time remains controversial. In this paper, we describe a new species of the rhyniopsid, Aberlemnia junggaria sp. nov., from the Pridoli (upper Silurian) of West Junggar, Xinjiang, China. The new plant consists of at least three orders of axes, an oval to reniform terminal sporangium bearing in sparse ultimate axes and sporangium with a nearly enclosed dehiscence line. A dataset of global Silurian macrofossil records was compiled, including 30 species within 24 genera from 38 localities covering 8 main paleogeographic blocks. Using these data, the spatial-temporal distribution of Silurian plant macrofossils was mapped. Biogeographic evolution is revealed for the first time by means of network analysis and cluster analysis, and two phytogeographic realms, the West Junggar-Vietnam and Laurussia-North Gondwana realms are provisionally recognized during the Pridoli Epoch. Considering the widespread microfossil evidence for land plant diversification and dispersal, this global phytogeographic zonation might have onset at an even earlier time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据