4.6 Article

Versatile Heterogeneous Catalytic System for the Selective Synthesis of Limonene Epoxide and Diepoxide

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 47, 页码 20152-20169

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02633

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The products obtained from limonene epoxidation can be used as intermediates or precursors in organic and pharmaceutical synthesis. In this study, commercial magnesium oxide was evaluated as a heterogeneous catalyst in the epoxidation of limonene, showing high yields of limonene epoxide and diepoxide under certain conditions.
The products obtained from limonene epoxidation can be used as intermediates or precursors in organic and pharmaceutical synthesis. Commercial magnesium oxide was evaluated as a heterogeneous catalyst in the epoxidation of R-(+)-limonene using H(2)O(2)in a Payne reaction system, using acetonitrile as an oxidant activator and water and acetone as solvents. The effect of temperature and the concentration of catalyst, H2O2, and limonene were evaluated; the highest yields for limonene epoxide (80%) and diepoxide (96%) were found at 50(degrees)C and 30 min and 2 h, respectively. Fresh and spent catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, Fourier transform-infrared, and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray. The efficiency of H2O2 in the epoxidation reaction varied between 100 and 20% in the time range of 0-30 min for all tested reaction conditions. The production of peroxyacetimidic acid as an intermediate oxidant in the limonene epoxide synthesis was described using a pseudohomogeneous reversible model (E = 58.61 kJ mol(-1)), while the heterogeneous model describes both the decomposition of H2O2(E = 29.06 kJ mol(-1)) and the epoxidation of limonene with the intermediate (E = 52.28 kJ mol(-1)). Leaching tests verified the heterogeneity of MgO which was used in four consecutive cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据