4.6 Article

Mechanism for π phase shifts in Little-Parks experiments: Application to 4Hb-TaS2 and to 2H-TaS2 intercalated with chiral molecules

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 108, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L180505

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, unusual pi phase shifts were observed in Little-Parks experiments on two systems derived from the layered superconductor 2H-TaS2. The pi phase shift was initially interpreted as evidence for exotic superconductivity in the individual 1H layers. However, this study suggests an alternative explanation, proposing that the superconductivity in the 1H layers is of conventional s-wave nature derived from the parent 2H-TaS2.
Recently, unusual pi phase shifts in Little-Parks experiments performed on two systems derived from the layered superconductor 2H-TaS2 were reported. These systems share the common feature that additional layers have been inserted between the 1H-TaS2 layers. In both cases, the pi phase shift has been interpreted as evidence for the emergence of exotic superconductivity in the 1H layers. Here, we propose an alternative explanation assuming that superconductivity in the individual 1H layers is of conventional s-wave nature derived from the parent 2H-TaS2. We show that a negative Josephson coupling between otherwise decoupled neighboring 1H layers can explain the observations. Furthermore, we find that the negative coupling can arise naturally assuming a tunneling barrier containing paramagnetic impurities. An important ingredient is the suppression of non-spinflip tunneling due to spin-momentum locking of Ising type in a single 1H layer together with the inversion symmetry of the double layer. In the exotic superconductivity scenario, it is challenging to explain why the critical temperature is almost the same as in the parent material and, in the 4Hb case, the superconductivity's robustness to disorder. Both are nonissues in our picture, which also exposes the common features that are special in these two systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据