Revision of the Quaternary calcareous nannofossil biochronology of Arctic Ocean sediments

Despite extensive chronological studies, the relationship between the age and sub-seafloor depth of Arctic Ocean sediments remains ambiguous. This prevents confident identification of paleoceanographic changes in the Arctic during the Quaternary. Currently, age-depth models derived from uranium-series decay in Arctic sediments diverge by hundreds of thousands of years compared to those built on known evolutionary appearances and extinctions of calcareous nannoplankton, a group of globally valuable age-markers. Here we report on highresolution biostratigraphic analysis of late Quaternary sediments in six cores from the central Arctic Ocean (CAO). We applied paired light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging to improve nannofossil diagnosis. We argue that low abundances and poor preservation have led to misidentification of the true stratigraphic depth of the critical Pleistocene nannofossil bio-events that have underpinned age models for many Arctic sedimentary records for decades. The revised calcareous nannofossil biochronology provides a radically different geochronological framework for CAO sediments - indicating that what had previously been identified as Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 7 (191-243 ka) in many sedimentary records is older than MIS 12 (424-478 ka). Furthermore, it suggests that previously inferred sub-stages of MIS 5 could represent full interglacial periods rather than interstadials. The results help reconcile the different dating approaches and provide a transformative step towards resolving the disparity in Quaternary Arctic age-depth models, bringing us one step closer to accurate paleoceanographic reconstructions based on sediment cores.

Automated summary

Despite extensive studies, the relationship between the age and sub-seafloor depth of Arctic Ocean sediments is still ambiguous. High-resolution biostratigraphic analysis of late Quaternary sediments in the central Arctic Ocean reveals a radically different geochronological framework, which helps reconcile different dating approaches and brings us one step closer to accurate paleoceanographic reconstructions.