4.6 Article

Novel Information-Driven Smoothing Spline Linearization Method for High-Precision Displacement Sensors Based on Information Criterions

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23229268

关键词

sensor; linearization; information criterion; model selection; smoothing spline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel information-driven smoothing spline linearization method is proposed for high-precision displacement sensors. The proposed method outperforms traditional methods and achieves better linearization results.
A noise-resistant linearization model that reveals the true nonlinearity of the sensor is essential for retrieving accurate physical displacement from the signals captured by sensing electronics. In this paper, we propose a novel information-driven smoothing spline linearization method, which innovatively integrates one new and three standard information criterions into a smoothing spline for the high-precision displacement sensors' linearization. Using theoretical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation, the proposed linearization method is demonstrated to outperform traditional polynomial and spline linearization methods for high-precision displacement sensors with a low noise to range ratio in the 10-5 level. Validation experiments were carried out on two different types of displacement sensors to benchmark the performance of the proposed method compared to the polynomial models and the the non-smoothing cubic spline. The results show that the proposed method with the new modified Akaike Information Criterion stands out compared to the other linearization methods and can improve the residual nonlinearity by over 50% compared to the standard polynomial model. After being linearized via the proposed method, the residual nonlinearities reach as low as +/- 0.0311% F.S. (Full Scale of Range), for the 1.5 mm range chromatic confocal displacement sensor, and +/- 0.0047% F.S., for the 100 mm range laser triangulation displacement sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据