4.7 Article

Twin-field quantum encryption protocol for E-payment based on blockchain

期刊

QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-023-04181-0

关键词

E-payment; Twin-field quantum; Quantum identity authentication; Blockchain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have proposed a twin-field quantum encryption protocol based on blockchain for electronic payment, in response to the security challenges faced by traditional encryption methods in the era of quantum computing. The protocol enables authentication and eavesdropping detection simultaneously and has the potential to break traditional boundaries, while demonstrating resilience against common attacks.
Electronic payment (E-payment) systems rely heavily on secure communication, typically achieved through encryption processes in cryptography. Traditional cryptography often relies on complex mathematical problems for encryption, such as difficult decompositions or extracting discrete logarithms. With the development of quantum computing, the security of these classical encryption methods is under threat. To address this challenge, quantum E-payment protocols have emerged as a potential solution. However, the practical quantum E-payment protocols are limited due to the channel transmission efficiency decreasing exponentially with distance. This is further constrained by the Pirandola-Laurenza-Ottaviani-Banchi (PLOB) bound. To address this challenge, we propose a twin-field quantum encryption protocol for E-payment based on blockchain. In our protocol, we propose a twin-field quantum encryption method to authenticate identity and detect eavesdropping simultaneously. It not only eliminates side-channel attacks on the detectors but also has the potential to break the PLOB bound. Our security analysis shows that our E-payment protocol exhibits security properties such as blindness, unforgeability, and undeniability. Furthermore, our protocol demonstrates withstand against common inside and outside attacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据