4.5 Article

Enhanced pursuance of dye-sensitized solar cell for indoor and outdoor stability using reduced graphene oxide @ Mn2O3 nanocomposite

期刊

CARBON LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s42823-023-00646-5

关键词

DSSC; Solar cells; Mn2O3; Counter electrode; rGO; Photovoltaics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a nanocomposite was synthesized as an effective counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Mn2O3 nanorods were synthesized using the hydrothermal method and merged with reduced graphene oxide to prepare the nanocomposite. The synthesized nanocomposites showed crystalline nature and were characterized using various techniques. The nanocomposites exhibited high photoconversion efficiency and lower charge transfer resistance in DSSC devices.
Herein, the present work focuses on the effective counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. The bottom-up approach was adapted to synthesize Mn2O3 nanorods via the hydrothermal method and the reduced graphene oxide was merged with Mn2O3 to prepare a nanocomposite. The prepared nanocomposites were subjected to physio-chemical and morphological characterizations which revealed the crystalline nature of Mn2O3 nanorods. The purity level rGO was characterized using the Raman spectrum and the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy employed to find the functional groups. The morphological micrographs were visualized using SEM and TEM and the high aspect ratio Mn2O3 nanorods were observed with 5-7 nm and supported by rGO sheets. The electrocatalytic nature and corrosion properties of the counter electrode towards the iodide electrolyte were studied using a symmetrical cell. The as-synthesized nanocomposites were introduced as counter electrodes for DSSC and produced 4.11% of photoconversion efficiency with lower charge transfer resistance. The fabricated DSSC devices were undergone for stability tests for indoor and outdoor atmospheres, the DSSC stability showed 93% and 80% respectively for 150 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据