3.8 Article

Political theory in social progress indices: the mutual benefits of theory and practice

期刊

POLITICAL RESEARCH EXCHANGE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2474736X.2023.2284759

关键词

Political Theory; indicators; social progress; concepts; measurements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent times, there has been a call for political theory to become more involved and relevant in political science and practice. Using the example of social progress indices, it is observed that political theory is already somewhat involved in both areas. In some cases, political theories inspire well-reasoned and systematic construction of measurements, although the conception of social progress in an index is not always explicit. Moreover, social progress indicators and concepts provide a valuable context for political theorists' self-reflection.
Recently political theorists have voiced a desire for political theory to be more involved in and relevant to political science and practice. Turning to a concrete instance, the case of social progress indices, we observe that political theory is already to some extent involved in both. Political theories in some instances inspire well-reasoned and systematic construction of measurements, although the conception of social progress in an index is not always overt. At the same time, social progress indicators and conceptions provide a substantial context to aid the self-reflections of political theorists. This note articulates the bidirectional actual and potential processes at play, with an emphasis on the cases when the conceptions represented by measurement are value-laden and contested. It further differentiates manners by which indicators may contribute to the internal and external assessments of concepts and theories. The study highlights the significance of recognizing and enhancing these multi-level and bidirectional processes. Such improvements would be achieved when political theory, political science and practical consideration come together.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据