4.3 Article

The Energy Charter Treaty at a critical juncture: of knowns, unknowns, and lasting significance

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgad035

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article envisions the future of international investment law and arbitration in the context of accelerating the shift towards renewable energy. It analyzes the importance of the Energy Charter Treaty in organizing the renewable energy market and explores potential future scenarios for the treaty. The article highlights pending cases, the resurgence of State contracts, and the shift to contract-based arbitration, while emphasizing the continued impact of the Energy Charter Treaty on international investment law and international energy governance.
This article envisions the future of international investment law and arbitration amidst the need to accelerate the shift towards renewable energy. Recognizing the risks of predicting the unknown, the article charts the delicate balance between forecasting a future legal framework and respecting past complexities. Focusing on the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), the article analyses 'known-knowns' rooted in positive law and 'known-unknowns' in the ECT's future. The article examines the ECT's design and scope in the first part, showing its pivotal role in organizing the renewable energy market through fair and equitable treatment and expropriation provisions. Against this backdrop, the article explores potential continuation, modernization, or abandonment scenarios and argues for a nuanced and anticipatory approach to the Treaty's evolving dynamics. It underscores the variety of pending cases, the potential resurgence of State contracts, and the shift to contract-based arbitration influenced by ECT decisions. Given the impasse over the ECT's modernization and the paradoxical nature of the ongoing energy transition, the ECT will continue to shape international investment law and international energy governance for the foreseeable future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据