4.6 Article

Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Growth Parameters of the Salvia splendens L. Plant

期刊

WATER
卷 15, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15234187

关键词

urban landscape; deficit irrigation; seasonal flower; water consumption; Salvia splendens L.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the developmental changes in Salvia splendens L., a commonly used flower, through deficit irrigation practices. The findings show that reducing water supply by 25% leads to significant improvements in most growth parameters, except for flower diameter. It is recommended to reduce water application by 25% when cultivating Salvia splendens L. in urban areas.
This study aims to investigate alterations in the developmental parameters of Salvia splendens L., a commonly utilized seasonal flower associated with excessive water consumption in urban green spaces, through the implementation of deficit irrigation practices. Four distinct irrigation treatments, which entailed maintaining the evaporation pot's water level at 100% (control), 75%, 50%, and 25% of the pot's water-holding capacity, were established. This study scrutinized 18 growth parameters to assess the impact of varying water application levels. The findings of this research revealed that Salvia splendens L. plants exhibited more substantial improvements in 17 out of 18 assessed parameters when subjected to 75% water application (representing a 25% reduction in water supply) in comparison to 100% water application (with no reduction). Notably, the only parameter negatively affected by reduced water availability in Salvia splendens L. was the diameter of the flowers. Thus, it is recommended to reduce water application by 25% when cultivating Salvia splendens L. in urban areas. Such a measure is expected to yield substantial water conservation benefits in urban landscaping. Consequently, it is advisable to promote the frequent utilization of Salvia splendens L. plants in urban green spaces, given their robust development even under conditions of water scarcity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据