4.7 Article

A theoretical model for the prediction of fracture process zone in concrete under fatigue loading: Energy based approach

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104850

关键词

Crack resistance; Critical energy dissipation; Fracture process zone; Heterogeneity; Stiffness degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop an energy-based theoretical formulation for predicting the evolution of the fracture process zone in concrete under fatigue loading. Experimental results and calibrations indicate that the specimen size and aggregate size affect the fracture behavior and process zone length of concrete.
Characterizing the fracture behaviour of concrete and accurately predicting its service life under fatigue loading poses a significant challenge due to its heterogeneous nature and complex fracture mechanisms. The proposed study focuses on developing an energy based theoretical formulation for predicting the evolution of the fracture process zone throughout repetitive loading cycles. A stiffness degradation approach has been adopted for developing the formulations for the critical energy dissipation and fully developed fracture process zone. Subsequently, the proposed analytical expressions have been calibrated and validated by performing experiments under centre point bending and using available experimental results in the literature. Experiments have been conducted on a centre-point bend beam with varying aggregate size in conjunction with the digital image correlation (DIC) technique to estimate the fracture characteristics. The influence of specimen size and heterogeneity has been discussed in the context of predicting the fracture behaviour, critical dissipated energy, and process zone length of plain concrete beam specimens under fatigue loading. The results indicate that the process zone length and critical energy release rate increase with an increase in specimen size, while the same decreases with an increase in aggregate size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据