4.6 Article

Porous Transport Layers with TiC-Coated Microporous Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 48, 页码 17075-17085

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c05256

关键词

porous transport layer; microporous layer; interfacial contact resistance; titanium carbide; proton exchange membrane water electrolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed porous transport layers incorporated with microporous layers using a phase inversion/vacuum sintering method. The addition of microporous layers improved the hydrophilicity, decreased the contact resistance, and enhanced the electrochemical performance of the porous transport layers. Additionally, the microporous layers enhanced the material's resistance against corrosion.
The performance of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer is greatly affected by the interfacial contact between the porous transport layer and the catalyst layer. Microporous layers have been widely used in proton exchange membrane fuel cells but have been less studied for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. In this study, porous transport layers incorporated with microporous layers are developed by using a phase inversion/vacuum sintering method. Characterizations show that the microporous layers uniformly cover the surface of titanium felt without significantly changing its porosity. After vacuum sintering, titanium carbide (TiC) is formed, which is an efficient protective layer against corrosion under acidic conditions and high potential. Compared with a titanium felt reference, the sintered microporous layer-based porous transport layers display better hydrophilicity. Polarization experiments find that the addition of microporous layers decreases the contact resistance, improves the electrochemical performance, and reduces the mass transfer resistance at a high current density. Ex situ and in situ stability testing confirms the material's enhanced inertness against corrosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据