4.6 Review

Modeling Red Blood Cell Metabolism in the Omics Era

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13111145

关键词

red blood cells; erythrocytes; systems biology; metabolomics; omics; genome-scale metabolic models; personalized medicine; transfusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Red blood cells are an abundant and relatively simple type of cells in the human body. They have been used as an ideal model for studying metabolism due to their accessibility. Computational models have the potential to enhance our understanding of red blood cell metabolism and predict their metabolic behaviors. Metabolomics and systems biology have provided evidence to advance our understanding of the storage lesion in red blood cells.
Red blood cells (RBCs) are abundant (more than 80% of the total cells in the human body), yet relatively simple, as they lack nuclei and organelles, including mitochondria. Since the earliest days of biochemistry, the accessibility of blood and RBCs made them an ideal matrix for the characterization of metabolism. Because of this, investigations into RBC metabolism are of extreme relevance for research and diagnostic purposes in scientific and clinical endeavors. The relative simplicity of RBCs has made them an eligible model for the development of reconstruction maps of eukaryotic cell metabolism since the early days of systems biology. Computational models hold the potential to deepen knowledge of RBC metabolism, but also and foremost to predict in silico RBC metabolic behaviors in response to environmental stimuli. Here, we review now classic concepts on RBC metabolism, prior work in systems biology of unicellular organisms, and how this work paved the way for the development of reconstruction models of RBC metabolism. Translationally, we discuss how the fields of metabolomics and systems biology have generated evidence to advance our understanding of the RBC storage lesion, a process of decline in storage quality that impacts over a hundred million blood units transfused every year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据