4.7 Review

Rice-Based Gluten-Free Foods and Technologies: A Review

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12224110

关键词

gluten free; rice product; food processing; food technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the quality attributes of rice-based gluten-free foods, such as bread, pasta, and beer, and explores the technological advancements and methods to improve their quality. By blending different gluten-free grains and incorporating additives to mimic gluten function, along with utilizing starch preprocessing and extrusion puffing processes, the quality of rice-based gluten-free products can be enhanced to meet consumer preferences.
Rice, one of the most widely consumed staples worldwide, serves as a versatile gluten-free substitute. However, review articles on technological developments in grain-free production focusing on rice are scarce. This review assesses various research results concerning the quality attributes of rice-based gluten-free foods, including bread, pasta, and beer. To optimize the key attributes in processed products, such as dough leavening in bread and the physical and cooking properties of noodles and pasta, research has focused on blending different gluten-free grains and incorporating additives that mimic the gluten function. Additionally, various processing technologies, such as starch preprocessing and extrusion puffing processes, have been employed to boost the quality of rice-based gluten-free products. Today, a variety of products, including bread, noodles, and beer, use rice as a partial replacement for barley or wheat. With rapid advancements in technology, a noticeable portion of consumers now shows a preference for products containing rice as a substitute. This trend indicates that rice-based gluten-free foods can be enhanced by leveraging the latest developments in gluten-free product technologies, particularly in countries where rice is a staple or is predominantly cultivated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据