4.5 Review

AI and machine learning for soil analysis: an assessment of sustainable agricultural practices

期刊

BIORESOURCES AND BIOPROCESSING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00710-y

关键词

Intelligent agriculture; Agronomic forecasting; Soil texture; Water content analysis; Smarter agriculture 4.0

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review paper introduces the use of artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning techniques for soil analysis, aiming to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of statistical analysis tools. Machine learning algorithms and geostatistical techniques can be employed to develop predictive models and interpolation methods, improving the spatial representation of the dataset. Furthermore, the paper evaluates the errors in soil water content analysis and discusses the advantages of AI data processing over traditional statistical analysis.
Sustainable agricultural practices help to manage and use natural resources efficiently. Due to global climate and geospatial land design, soil texture, soil-water content (SWC), and other parameters vary greatly; thus, real time, robust, and accurate soil analytical measurements are difficult to be developed. Conventional statistical analysis tools take longer to analyze and interpret data, which may have delayed a crucial decision. Therefore, this review paper is presented to develop the researcher's insight toward robust, accurate, and quick soil analysis using artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML) platforms to attain robustness in SWC and soil texture analysis. Machine learning algorithms, such as random forests, support vector machines, and neural networks, can be employed to develop predictive models based on available soil data and auxiliary environmental variables. Geostatistical techniques, including kriging and co-kriging, help interpolate and extrapolate soil property values to unsampled locations, improving the spatial representation of the data set. The false positivity in SWC results and bugs in advanced detection techniques are also evaluated, which may lead to wrong agricultural practices. Moreover, the advantages of AI data processing over general statistical analysis for robust and noise-free results have also been discussed in light of smart irrigation technologies. Conclusively, the conventional statistical tools for SWCs and soil texture analysis are not enough to practice and manage ergonomic land management. The broader geospatial non-numeric data are more suitable for AI processing that may soon help soil scientists develop a global SWC database.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据