4.7 Article

Cellulose-in-cellulose 3D-printed bioaerogels for bone tissue engineering

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05601-1

关键词

Aerogels; Supercritical carbon dioxide; 3D-printing; Nanocellulose; SPIONs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully constructed nanostructured cellulose scaffolds based on 3D-printing and supercritical carbon dioxide technology, which exhibited high porosity and personalized morphologies. The scaffolds were decorated with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Biocompatibility and functionalization of the cellulose scaffolds were confirmed through various tests.
Nanostructured scaffolds based on cellulose with advanced performances and personalized morphologies for bone tissue engineering are under technological development. 3D-printing and supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) technologies are innovative processing strategies that, when combined, allow the precise fabrication of highly porous aerogel scaffolds. Novel sterile cellulose-in-cellulose aerogels decorated with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are synthesized in this work by an integrated technological platform based on 3D-printing and scCO2. Methylcellulose (MC) and bacterial nanocellulose (BC) are two versatile cellulosic polysaccharides with remarkable physicochemical and biological performances, whereas SPIONs are commonly used to functionalize biomaterials aimed at tissue engineering. Aerogels with hierarchical porosity and high structural resolution were obtained according to nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis, confocal, scanning and transmission microscopies (SEM and TEM). The magnetic properties of SPIONs-doped aerogels confirmed the correct functionalization of the nanostructures. Finally, NIH/3T3 fibroblast cell viability, hemocompatibility with human blood and safety tests (in ovo with HET-CAM and in vivo with Artemia salina) indicate the biocompatibility of the cellulose-in-cellulose aerogels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据