3.8 Article

How much more time do you need?: Anthropological-Legal Reflections on the Impact of Chronopolitics for Asylum Seekers in Italy: Alasan's Story

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12134-023-01108-7

关键词

Chronopolitics; Invisibilization; Deresponsibilization; Anthropology of law

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, Italy and the EU have implemented various measures and strategies to expedite the recognition of international protection. However, these efforts have inadvertently weakened the protective capacity of the system. This article, based on ongoing ethnographic research since 2012, examines how the management of time affects different actors involved in migration flows and explores the impact of these processes on migrants' experiences and the legal framework.
The last decade has witnessed an increasing proliferation of measures and strategies included in Italian and EU legislation to speed up the procedure for recognizing international protection, implicitly emptying it of its protective capacity. The contribution, part of ethnographic research that started in 2012 and is still in progress, intends to analyze how the use of time as a tool to govern contemporary migration flows acts differentially in terms of time spent, the time allowed, and time available, considering the different actors involved in determining its rhythm (Jacobsen and Karlsen, 2021; Della Puppa and Sano in Studi Emigrazione, 220, 2020, in Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 26(5), 503-527, 2021; Rozakou, 2021). The paper will be composed of two parts: in the first one, through the presentation of a life story, the impact on migrants' experiences and emotional reactions to this unilateral determination of time dictated by policies and regulations will be problematized. The second part aims to examine the rationality of these procedures and assess their impact on the provisions in the broader legal framework. It seems interesting to investigate how control over time and through time (Tazzioli in Political Geography, 64, 13-22, 2018) is configured as a specific modality of relations between parts of the world (Fabian, 2021: 75), particularly how the temporal architectures (Sharma, 2014) enacted by Italy and the European Union have been codified in the law and governance policies of the current migration flow, and how migrants experience and endure these policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据