4.2 Article

A century of urban planning for Zanzibar's other side, 1923-2023

期刊

PLANNING PERSPECTIVES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2023.2287514

关键词

Africa; postcolonial cities; urban planning; Zanzibar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the changes and lack thereof in 100 years of professional planning in Zanzibar, Tanzania, with a focus on the historic core area known as Ng'ambo. The gap between formal plans and their implementation is examined, particularly in the recent planning initiatives since 2011. The study explores whether inclusive planning has strengthened the citizenship of the urban poor majority or if it has continued the state planning failures for Ng'ambo's residents.
This paper interrogates what has and has not changed in 100 years of professional planning in Zanzibar, Tanzania. The geographical focus is on the area of the historic core of the city known as Ng'ambo (a KiSwahili place-name meaning 'the Other Side'). The gap between formal plans for infrastructure, housing, or neighbourhood development, and their implementation, is examined in its evolution over this century. The central focus of the empirical examination resides with the most recent planning initiatives, since 2011, which present a strongly inclusive and participatory emphasis for planning on the Other Side. The key research question is this: has this new era of inclusive planning strengthened the urban poor majority's citizenship, or has it continued the long run of state planning failures for Ng'ambo's residents? This essay argues that, despite progressive ambitions, in implementation there are a number of continuities with both colonial and post-independence planning, where outside powers and elite interests have predominated. The paper is built from more than thirty years of the author's research on urban planning in Ng'ambo and engagement with the literature of urban planning studies in Africa and the Global South.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据