4.6 Article

Monitoring Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Progression According to Reactive Oxygen Metabolite Derivative Levels

期刊

CANCERS
卷 15, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235517

关键词

colorectal adenocarcinoma; tumor marker; treatment response; chemotherapy; oxidative stress

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between oxidative stress and treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The rate of change in reactive oxygen metabolite derivatives (d-ROM) was found to be a predictor of treatment response. This research is important for understanding the mechanisms of colorectal cancer treatment and guiding clinical practice.
Oxidative stress has been implicated in the development, proliferation, and metastasis of colorectal cancer, but few studies have considered how oxidative stress changes in relation to treatment response. In this study, we investigated whether the rate of change in reactive oxygen metabolite derivatives (d-ROM)-serum markers of oxidative stress-could predict treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer. We enrolled 53 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with 3 months of chemotherapy. We measured d-ROM levels and performed computed tomography before and after chemotherapy, and we examined the change in d-ROM levels for each anticancer treatment. Factors influencing the d-ROM ratio (post-treatment: pre-treatment levels) were examined using linear regression analysis. d-ROM levels decreased in patients showing a partial response (p < 0.001) and increased in those showing disease progression (p = 0.042). An increasing d-ROM ratio was associated with disease progression (regression coefficient: 0.416, 95% confidence interval: 0.279-0.555, p < 0.001). Our study indicates that d-ROM levels are useful markers of tumor progression and that the d-ROM ratio is useful for predicting treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据