4.3 Article

Trading on Diverse Relationships: The Process of Racialized Social Commodification in Multiracial Congregations

期刊

SOCIOLOGY OF RACE AND ETHNICITY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/23326492231213327

关键词

diversity; racial inequality; organization; commodities; church

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the strategies of leaders of multiracial churches to raise funds for their organizations. The findings reveal how these leaders leverage their embeddedness with congregants of color, social and cultural capital, and the racial status of their organizations to gain access to social and organizational benefits. This research highlights the persistence of racial inequality even in organizations with strong cross-racial relationships.
Diverse organizations focus on appearing progressive but, in practice, may reproduce internal and external racial inequalities. Previous research has focused on how organizations with superficial levels of diversity may be detrimental to racial equity; are organizations with deep and sustained, cross-racial relationships any better? Drawing on in-depth interviews, field notes, and surveys of 121 head clergy of multiracial churches, we examine the strategies of leaders of multiracial churches to raise funds for their organizations. Our systematic analysis reveals how these, mostly White, religious leaders act as brokers by leveraging embeddedness with congregants of color, social and cultural capital within institutions valuing diversity, and the racial status of their organizations to gain access to social and organizational benefits. We develop a theoretical concept called racialized social commodification (RSC) to explore how leaders convert the racial capital of people of color into social and economic resources in contexts of substantive diversity. Through RSC, even organizations boasting strong, cross-racial relationships continue to reproduce racial inequality by protecting power and resource hierarchies that benefit White Americans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据