4.7 Article

Adaptive changes in the DNA damage response during skeletal muscle cell differentiation

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1239138

关键词

DNA damage response; cellular differentiation; skeletal muscle; cell cycle; cell death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the dynamics of DNA damage response (DDR) during cellular differentiation using an in vitro model. The findings reveal that differentiated skeletal muscle cells have a prolonged DDR but are competent in repairing DNA breaks and enhancing cell survival. The study also uncovers the strategies employed by the muscle cells to maintain genetic integrity and organ function after DNA damage.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger specialized cellular mechanisms that collectively form the DNA damage response (DDR). In proliferating cells, the DDR serves the function of mending DNA breaks and satisfying the cell-cycle checkpoints. Distinct goals exist in differentiated cells that are postmitotic and do not face cell-cycle checkpoints. Nonetheless, the distinctive requirements and mechanistic details of the DDR in differentiated cells are still poorly understood. In this study, we set an in vitro differentiation model of human skeletal muscle myoblasts into multinucleated myotubes that allowed monitoring DDR dynamics during cell differentiation. Our results demonstrate that myotubes have a prolonged DDR, which is nonetheless competent to repair DSBs and render them significantly more resistant to cell death than their progenitors. Using live-cell microscopy and single-molecule kinetic measurements of transcriptional activity, we observed that myotubes respond to DNA damage by rapidly and transiently suppressing global gene expression and rewiring the epigenetic landscape of the damaged nucleus. Our findings provide novel insights into the DDR dynamics during cellular differentiation and shed light on the strategy employed by human skeletal muscle to preserve the integrity of the genetic information and sustain long-term organ function after DNA damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据